MESTO ZA HRADBAMI - identita verzus imidž
Medzinárodná konferencia historických miest Európy
English version
Slovenská verzia

Manifest opevnených miest k Európskej Únii

Dokument bol prijatý účastníkmi konferencie "Fortress as a Corset" v holandskom meste ´s-Hertogenbosch v októbri 2005 a následne bol odovzdaný európskemu komisárovi, p.Jánovi Figeľovi ako holandská výzva smeurjúca k navýšeniu finančných prostriedkov z rozpočtu EU venovaných na záchranu a obnovu historického dedičstva v európskych opevnených mestách. Podujatie sa konalo - podobne ako konferencia v Trenčíne - pod záštitou a s podporou Kruhu priateľov opevnených miest (Walled Towns Friendship Circle). K dispozícii iba v anglickom jazyku.


'S-HERTOGENBOSCH DECLARATION 

on the future of European Walled Towns and regions.

Introduction

'The cultural heritage of Europe from the cultural landscapes of rural areas to the historic town centres is the expression of its identity and is of world-wide importance.’

This proposition (number 133) from the European Spatial Development Perspective[1] is warmly endorsed by European walled towns and regions. The Dutch town of ’s‑Hertogenbosch was nominated European Walled Town 2005 by the European organisation of Walled Towns, the Walled Towns Friendship Circle. 

Within that framework various European conferences were held in this town, in which the focus was on the opportunities and dangers facing walled towns. During these meetings many experiences were exchanged concerning the utilisation of the military-historical heritage in future developments. In order for collective initiatives to be implemented, it is essential that attention is paid to historic fortifications in the new European structural fund programme. This declaration, laid down at the congress on 28 October 2005 in s-Hertogenbosch, is endorsed by the participating European walled towns.

Proposition1. Defence ist the best form of attack

Throughout the centuries we have maintained a changing relationship with our walled towns. Long ago they offered us protection from the enemy in times of need. Later the old town walls and ramparts were increasingly seen as an old-fashioned and restrictive corset. Due to their limited space, the development of these towns at this time gave them a very special character. An individuality, the effect of which can still be seen today and must be preserved in the future. In particular the security resulting from the relatively high density and a medieval character are typical features unique to these towns.

In time security was replaced by a sense of oppression. That led to demolition, deterioration and dereliction. Today our walled towns are once again receiving attention and are being readied for action once more. They serve as a buffer against new enemies: obscurity and uniformity. They must combat apathy with regard to cultural-historic values and a uniform and faceless urban environment. Whereas in earlier times walled towns defended us, we must now do everything in our power to defend our walled towns, until they in turn are once again able to defend our identity.

Proposition 2. Walled towns possess an extraordinary wealth. The cultural capital that they represent must be converted into cultural equity.

Cultural history is an integral component of our society and is not without obligations. We see the linking of cultural history to the making of new history, preferably in a high-quality and contemporary style, not as a threat but as a challenge for our generation. Cultural history is not a leaden burden, on the contrary it is a valuable source of inspiration when designing our future. This way cultural capital is converted into cultural wealth: from passive to active, from introvert to extrovert, from conservative to progressive, from museological to social. Greater awareness in various circles leads to broader social support. Latent interest leads to more interest, interest to appreciation and appreciation ultimately to preservation. Our walled towns are the gold that will enable us to give shape to this social grounding.

Proposition 3. Our walled towns must increasingly train their sights outwards

Traditionally walled towns have turned inwards. Protecting the citizens within the town gates: that was what they were for. Nevertheless our walled towns still maintained - and continue to maintain - close relations with the surrounding areas. Often fortifications were erected as outposts within a radius of many kilometres from the town itself. And the relics of this military past can still be found everywhere, if you just look closely. At the same time, the realisation that a fortified town does not end at the town wall provides an insight into good relations between town and countryside today. So we can restore the historic symbiosis between the red (development), blue (water) and green (countryside). The area of tension between the high density of the town and the open pastureland of the surrounding landscape demands a good balance and an active interaction. This perspective also provides an insight into supralocal cooperations, which will substantially increase support for our collective mission - the revitalisation of our walled towns and the surrounding region.

Proposition 4. There is no fixed formula for the restoration of our walled towns.

'Renovation takes precedence over preservation' became 'Preservation takes precedence over renovation': the history of our idea of restoration in a nutshell. Nowadays we can choose from many forms of restoration: from a complete reconstruction according to the character of a specific era, to leaving a ruin as a ruin. Obviously each individual restoration demands a situational approach. Sometimes we are forced to opt for major intervention in order to make the history of our walled towns visible once again and available for visitors to experience. At other times we prefer to choose the tranquillity, the poetry of the place, allowing visitors to experience its mysterious character. Also we should not be afraid to occasionally add contemporary elements to our old walled towns. After all, what we build today will be tomorrow's heritage, provided this task is carried out in a respectful, creative and quality-enhancing way. Only in this way will we succeed in preserving the historic dynamic of the place, including the period of deterioration, demolition and renewed attention in our time. In addition this method of working offers ample possibilities for our inhabitants and for tourist differentiation. This is why no restoration can ever be fitted into a tight straightjacket. In every town and at every place, the basic principle is that planning takes cultural history as its starting point.

Proposition 5. Old walled towns form the ideal stage for contemporary presentations.
 
Our walled towns are seen by many as impressive complexes. They are robust, fit for their purpose, strongly-built, so at times they can also be atmospheric and mysterious. They often involve massive structures that hug our towns like a stone embrace. This vastness offers plenty of opportunities for staging modern productions. The old walled town forms a huge urban stage on which artists, re-enactment groups, musicians, theatrical companies and other presenters of cultural or even sporting events are spotlighted. In this way modern and historic times go hand-in-hand. Continually bringing the town's history into the foreground, in varied and contemporary ways, increases the educational and entertaining character of our towns. More resources will be needed to utilise educational potentials. Creativity and historicity enter into an exciting alliance. Images of the intense struggles and sufferings of war, with which we traditionally associate our walled towns, can then give way to new experiences and adventures. A Rampart could turn into Ramp Art. In this way our walled towns will occupy an active role in the present day cultural field and will not be merely a backdrop.

Proposition 6. Walled towns must open wide their doors.

Our walled towns must be welcoming both to visitors from outside the town and to local residents. Fortifications form the frame for the painting. This frame can make an important contribution towards improving the relationship between the historic town and the surrounding areas. With urban renewal we can use our city wall as a pedestrian walkway, a public park designed to strengthen social cohesion. In addition an attractive town will mean that the pressure of visitors in the town centre can be better spread. 'Keep out' will become 'welcome', both from the outskirts to the town centre and from the centre to out-of-town.

7. Proposition participants congress 
Information.

8. Proposition participants congress
Information.

9. Proposition participants congress
Information.

Thus drawn up in 's-Hertogenbosch on 28 October 2005.


[1] Agreed at the Informal Council of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning in Potsdam , May 1999.

Mediálni partneri

Finančná podpora

© 2006 Mesto Trenčín